Landing page feedback: Tracetics — funnel analytics for indie devs

The headline sells the integration, not the pain.
"Funnel analytics that fit in one HTTP POST" leads with HOW it works before the visitor has decided they want it. A developer evaluating analytics tools isn't searching for "fits in one HTTP POST." They're thinking "I don't know where my onboarding is breaking and I need to find out fast." The differentiator is real, but it answers the wrong question first.

There's no customer evidence anywhere on the page.
No testimonials, no logos, no case studies. For a dev tool entering a market with Mixpanel, PostHog, and Amplitude, that trust vacuum is loud. "Real-time event tracking" and "GDPR-ready" are table stakes that every competitor claims. Without at least one real team saying what changed after they integrated, the feature list reads as assertions, not proof.

The pricing descriptions don't help the right buyer self-select.
Starter is "ideal for small teams and growing products." Pro is "built for teams managing multiple apps or higher traffic volumes." Premium is "for established products." Those three descriptions could each apply to the same company at the same stage depending on how they interpret themselves. There's no concrete trigger — a number, a scenario, a named problem — that makes a visitor say "that one's obviously mine."

These are the three that jumped out immediately. There are usually more. Drop your URL at https://briefd.it and I'll send the full breakdown free, PDF in your inbox.