Looking for 1 workflow where everyone thought the work was done.
Usually it wasn't.
The task was completed.
The update was shared.
The decision moved forward.
But people left with different expectations of what completion meant.
One person expected approval.
Another expected review.
Someone else expected a follow-up.
The work finishes.
The expectation does not.
Send 3–5 lines:
- the workflow
- what was considered complete
- what happened afterward
I'll show where reopening starts.
24h turnaround.
$39
Trending on Indie Hackers
Workflow: Feature deployment to production.
What was considered complete: The engineering team finished development, QA approved the feature, and it was deployed successfully.
What happened afterward: Product expected analytics tracking to be configured, support expected customer documentation, and marketing expected a release announcement. The feature was technically complete, but several teams had different assumptions about what "done" included, so the work was reopened.
Great example.
The feature was technically complete, but the definition of "done" was not shared across teams.
That's exactly where reopening tends to begin.
Thanks for sharing.
You're welcome. I'm a U.S.-based Senior Full Stack AI Engineer. If you ever need additional help with a project, I'd be happy to assist. Thanks.
Thanks for reaching out.
I'll keep that in mind.
Appreciate it.
Hi, sir.
Profile: https://topstar-ai.github.io
I’d really appreciate the opportunity to connect and promise good benefit to you.
Looking forward to your thoughts.
Best regards.
Thanks for reaching out.
I reviewed your profile and GitHub.
You seem to have solid experience across AI, automation, and agent systems.
Looking forward to learning more about what you're currently building.
Best,
Koni