
Hello all, I've released https://www.getdatapipe.com/ this week, in private beta - it's been in the works for the last couple of months. It was initially built for my needs but have pivoted a lot of times since then.
I'd like to get some feedback on the following:
thank you!
I think I would totally be a customer, assuming:
hi @omneity
would you be open to becoming one of the IH beta user ? otherwise drop me an email richard [at ] getdatapipe.com thank you
Nice product, would pay for it if I had a use case.
Thank you, in hindsight there’s a lot of use-cases for this simple product.
to name a few
All can be managed through Google Sheet. Cheers
Looks good) BTW, better question is “would you pay for it?”
Ahah nice one! thank you, will change it
It was clear to me within seconds what you do, without having to read too much.
I really like that you have a demo as well, that would increase my confidence. I think if someone makes the effort to try the demo, they're probably half way to converting!
I don't need this at the moment, but my one concern from the start is WHERE my data would be resting. Your text says "stop worrying about servers", and I know what you mean - but as a data custodian I always have to worry about it :-) If you're hosting on AWS, I would put that clearly - that gives some immediate trust. Or some other cloud provider that would be known to technical customers.
Hello, this is another great feedback.
few things on top of my head:
Thank you for your feedback!
Cheers
Hello all,
Just a couple of heads up on what happened 4 days after asking for a feedback. Overall it's been great so far. I've written a short blog: a quick summary and what has been done so far.
A super quick summary:
See more details at
https://www.getdatapipe.com/
https://www.getdatapipe.com/post/update-4-days-after-we-launched-at-indie-hackers
thank you
the bottom left "json data models" : why is it there? Does it imply the service will deliver all data in JSON?
hi, thanks for looking at it. yep I initially thought of just JSON response, at least on this release - but if there's a demand for other formats like XML, GraphQL or RSS Feeds - should be doable.
what are your thoughts on that ? thanks
that's cool. All I am saying is that it's not clear why that json bit is there. Maybe change the wording or remove it all together.
Great feedback. Looking at it again, sounds like limiting the functionality of the service - will change it or remove it . Thank you