Thunder Client is a widely used extension for VSCode, specifically designed for API testing. In this article, we'll explore how to effectively use this extension based on firsthand experience and discuss whether it can truly replace Postman.

Thunder Client is an extension for Visual Studio Code that serves as an API client. It offers features such as API testing, collections, test scripts, CI/CD integration, Git collaboration, and local storage. Many users prefer Thunder Client as a lightweight GUI API testing tool within VS Code, often using it as a substitute for Postman.
Despite being a lightweight tool, Thunder Client is fully equipped for API testing. For example:
For those looking to test APIs directly and quickly from within VSCode during development, Thunder Client is an excellent choice.
So how can you test APIs using Thunder Client in VS Code? Here, we'll introduce the main features available in Thunder Client.
To use Thunder Client, first install it as an extension in Visual Studio Code. Follow these steps:

Now, the Thunder Client extension will be installed on your computer.
Once Thunder Client is installed, you’ll see an icon for it in the left menu of VS Code. Click on this icon to start using Thunder Client.
Step 1: To begin testing an API, click the New Request button at the top of the screen.

Step 2: The API configuration screen will appear. Here you can enter the HTTP method, API endpoint, and required parameters. Click the Send button to submit your request.

All sent requests will be displayed in the Activity tab on the left.
After receiving response data from the server, you can use Thunder Client's testing functionality to validate that data.
In the API execution screen, click on the Tests tab to add validation conditions.
For example, you can set conditions like:
When you click the Send button, the results of your response validation will be shown in the rightmost panel.

Similar to Postman, Thunder Client supports collection execution. You can add previously sent requests to a collection via the Activity tab or create new requests within the collection.

While Thunder Client allows you to send multiple requests in bulk, it lacks more advanced testing features, such as request grouping and condition-based testing for automation.
Additionally, like Postman, the execution of collections is limited. In the free version, you can only execute collections 30 times a month.
Related Reading:
Resolved: Solutions to Postman Collection Runner Limitations
When you hit the limit on Postman's collection runner, you encounter the "You have exhausted all the runs." error, which can be disruptive. This article provides solutions for overcoming the Postman collection limits for free.
Can the Thunder Client extension for VS Code fully replace Postman? In short, while Thunder Client is useful, Postman offers a more specialized and feature-rich API testing experience, making Thunder Client a temporary substitute. However, if you only need to send API requests directly from VS Code during development, Thunder Client is quite handy.
Next, let's look at the reasons why Thunder Client may fall short.
First, Thunder Client imposes a paywall that restricts access to many of its features in the free version. This limitation can significantly hinder your ability to fully utilize the tool for API development. In contrast, Postman offers a more comprehensive set of features even in its free version, allowing users to set up mock servers, automate tests, and collaborate on projects.
However, the free version of Postman also comes with certain limitations, such as restricted usage limits for its advanced features. Although both tools have their constraints, the mandatory payment model of Thunder Client can make it challenging for users looking to access a wide range of functionalities without incurring costs.

This is where a more powerful API testing tool like EchoAPI shines, offering robust features even in its free version.
While Thunder Client allows you to execute multiple requests at once by adding them to the same collection, it does not offer advanced testing features such as request grouping or conditional branching. In contrast, Postman provides the ability to leverage collection features and customize testing steps with various conditions through its flow functionality, making API test automation straightforward.

For a more user-friendly experience in conducting advanced testing and automation, EchoAPI stands out. Unlike Postman, where collection and flow functionalities are separate, EchoAPI enables intuitive GUI interactions to add testing steps and apply conditions, enhancing convenience significantly.
When working in a team on API development, Thunder Client can be quite limiting. It lacks an account system, making it difficult to collaborate with other team members and share API data with them. On the other hand, Postman offers collaboration features that allow seamless updates to API data among team members.

Additionally, EchoAPI provides collaboration functionality similar to Postman. Any changes made within a project are synchronized with all team members seamlessly. EchoAPI also supports a "sprint branch" feature akin to Git, where team members can create their own branches to introduce changes without affecting the Main branch data. After completing changes, they can merge them into the Main branch, further improving collaboration efficiency in API development.
This article has explored the use of Thunder Client, a VS Code extension, and its viability as an alternative to Postman.
Thunder Client provides essential features for API testing, such as GUI-based validation of response results and bulk execution of multiple requests. However, it lacks the advanced functionalities found in Postman, particularly in areas like mock server setup, test automation, and collaboration. Therefore, while Thunder Client is useful for simple API requests, Postman remains better suited for rigorous API testing.
For thorough API testing or development that emphasizes collaboration, EchoAPI emerges as a compelling alternative to Postman, offering ease of use and more straightforward advanced testing capabilities.
From $0 to $1K MRR in 8 Months: Bootstrapping Habit Pixel as a Solo Dev
How to acquire your first users for $0?
Getting my first 100 users with $0: what actually worked
Helping budget-conscious startups and individual developers grow their user base: starting at just $20 per month!