AI Signal Bot
Turn let me check with the team into an auto-updated Jira
One thing we've noticed while working on AI products is that the hardest part often isn't choosing an LLM.
It's everything around it.
You still need to build the interface, workflow, integrations, data access, validation, permissions, review steps, and deployment infrastructure before users can actually interact with the AI.
That can turn a promising AI idea into months of engineering work.
So we started exploring a different approach at GeekyAnts: AI Accelerators.
The idea is simple:
Start with working AI software, then adapt it to the specific workflow instead of building everything from scratch.
What we're currently working with
AI Signal Bot
This is designed around project execution.
It monitors project conversations, identifies execution risks, generates structured updates, and routes approvals to the appropriate stakeholders.
The goal isn't to create another chatbot.
It's to turn conversations into actionable project signals and reduce the manual follow-up that teams constantly have to do.
InsightDeck AI
This tackles a completely different problem: turning messy reporting data into something executives can actually consume.
It takes multi-tab Excel and CSV files, analyzes the data, identifies patterns, generates visualizations and narratives, and populates approved PowerPoint templates.
The interesting part for us is that these aren't just AI demos.
They're starting points for real workflows.
Why we're taking this approach
Building an AI solution from scratch means solving the same foundational problems repeatedly:
How does the workflow operate?
Where does the data come from?
How does the AI access it?
How do we validate outputs?
Where does human review happen?
How does it connect to existing systems?
How do we handle permissions and security?
What happens when the requirements change?
An accelerator gives teams a functional foundation first.
From there, it can be adapted around their data, users, workflows, rules, integrations, and operational requirements.
I think this is where AI product development is heading
I'm increasingly skeptical of the "build an AI prototype and figure out production later" approach.
The prototype isn't usually the hard part anymore.
The hard part is getting something useful into an actual workflow.
That's why I think reusable AI software foundations are going to become increasingly interesting especially for teams that don't want to spend six months rebuilding infrastructure before they can validate whether an AI workflow is actually valuable.
We're still evolving the approach, but that's the thinking behind the GeekyAnts AI Accelerator initiative.
I'd love to hear from other founders and product teams:
Would you rather start with a reusable AI workflow and customize it, or build your AI application completely from scratch?
Quick context on why I built this: every team I've worked with runs real project status through WhatsApp blockers, priority changes, "pushing this to Friday" and none of it makes it into Jira unless someone manually logs it. So the PM tool is always a little stale, and managers end up reconstructing "what's actually happening" by scrolling chat threads.
What it does:
You add a dedicated assistant number to your project WhatsApp group. It reads the conversation, picks up on task/status/priority signals, and proposes an action create a task, change status, flag a blocker, whatever fits. A lead or manager approves/edits/rejects it, and only then does it hit Jira, Asana, ClickUp, or whatever you use.
Nothing updates without a human saying yes. It's not trying to "automate" your PM tool, just close the gap between what your team already said and what your system of record shows.
Why WhatsApp specifically:
Because that's where the update already happens. Every attempt I've seen to fix this by adding more process (new reporting habits, forms, bot commands) fails because people don't change how they communicate. So instead of fighting that, we just read what's already there.
Where it's at:
Built the core pipeline (signal detection → structured action → approval → sync), plus role-based views for Leads/Managers/CEOs so everyone gets the right level of detail. Integration typically takes ~3 days once the WhatsApp group, PM tool, and approval rules are defined.
Would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with the "WhatsApp vs. project tool" gap is this a real pain for your team, or does everyone already have this solved some other way I haven't seen?
3 Comments
The accelerator idea makes sense, but I’d want to know what remains configurable after handoff. If every new permission rule or integration needs the original team, it feels closer to repeatable consulting than a product foundation. If the customer can own those changes, the time savings compound.
That is an important distinction. The accelerator is designed as a product foundation, not as a solution that permanently depends on the original implementation team.
After handoff, the customer’s team owns the solution, data, configurations, and integrations. They can manage permission rules, workflows, and future changes internally based on the access and documentation provided. There is no mandatory ongoing dependency on the team that built it.
If additional support, complex customization, or new integrations are needed, our team can help, but that support is optional. You can also book a demo directly through the product page to see what is configurable and how the handoff works in practice.
This comment was deleted 13 days ago