I've built 10+ businesses from scratch. Most succeeded. Am I a 10x founder — or just old?

Genuine question, not a flex.
Over four decades I've started and managed more than ten businesses. A minority were tech-based. Most were successful. The failures taught me more than the successes, but the pattern across all of them taught me the most.
Here's what I noticed: the businesses that failed rarely failed because of a bad product or a bad market. They failed because of structural problems — unclear roles between partners, assumptions that were never made explicit, decision-making that drifted without anyone noticing. The same five or six patterns, repeating across completely different industries and decades.
The businesses that worked had the opposite: clear coordination, visible agreements, roles that matched the actual stage of the business rather than the stage it started at.
I'm now building two products based on that observation. VentureProof (getventureproof.com) is a structural diagnostic for early-stage ventures — maps whether the founding team's coordination matches what the business actually needs. Family Clarity Test (familyclarity.net) applies the same diagnostic lens to households — because two adults running a family face the same coordination challenges as two founders running a company.
Both are solo builds. Both are pre-revenue. Both are being marketed on a near-zero budget. I'm 2 months in.
The thing I keep thinking about: the indie hacker community skews heavily toward first-time, tech-first founders. The default playbook assumes you're young, technical, and building your first thing. Most of the advice — "ship fast," "find PMF," "talk to users" — is correct but incomplete. It doesn't account for the structural patterns that repeat across businesses, because most people giving the advice haven't built enough businesses to see the repetition.
So here's my actual question: does the experience of building 10+ businesses make you better at building the next one? Or does it just make you more aware of everything that can go wrong — which is a different thing entirely?
I genuinely don't know the answer. Some days the pattern recognition feels like a superpower. Other days it feels like a cage — I can see every structural risk so clearly that it slows me down instead of speeding me up.
For anyone else building their second, third, or tenth thing: did it get easier, or just different?