JupiterMeet Pro

Hey IH,

Why spend months building a full product from scratch…
Then add payments, plans, feature restrictions, and everything else?

When you can start with something ready and focus on the business side instead.

That’s exactly where JupiterMeet Pro fits in.

It gives you a ready-to-use SaaS foundation for video conferencing. You can launch your own platform, put your branding on it, create plans, and start charging users from day one.

No need to worry about building the core tech.

We’ve seen people turn their existing audience into paying customers using this. Coaches, educators, agencies… even founders building niche platforms.

Instead of building everything from scratch, they focus on growth, positioning, and revenue.

You focus on the business.
We handle the tech.

Curious - would you build from scratch or start with something ready and launch faster?

Hey IH,

Most of us treat video calls as just another tool.

We plug in Zoom or Google Meet, move on, and focus on the “real” product.

But recently we started thinking differently.

What if video meetings are the product?

Instead of sending users to a third-party tool, what if you owned that entire experience? Your branding, your users, your data, and even the revenue.

That’s the idea behind what we’ve been working on with JupiterMeet Pro.

We wanted to make it possible for founders to not just use video meetings, but actually build on top of them. Turn them into a feature, a platform, or even a full SaaS business with subscriptions and recurring revenue.

We’ve seen a few interesting use cases already:

• Agencies offering branded meeting portals to clients

• Coaches and educators running paid sessions

• Founders building niche communication platforms

It’s obviously more effort than just using Zoom. But it opens up a completely different opportunity.

Curious how others think about this.

Would you ever turn something like video calls into your core product, or is it better left as a tool?

Hey IH,

We kept noticing the same pattern.

Whenever someone wanted to add video meetings to their product or business, they had to rely on tools like Zoom or Google Meet. It works, but you’re always building on top of someone else’s platform.

You can’t fully brand it.
You don’t really control the data.
And costs start adding up as usage grows.

For many use cases, that’s fine. But for people trying to build something of their own, it becomes a limitation.

So we built JupiterMeet Pro.

The idea was simple. Give people a way to run video meetings on their own terms. Host it themselves, put their own branding on it, and even turn it into a SaaS if they want.

Since then, we’ve seen it used in different ways. Some use it for internal meetings, some for education or client calls, and a few are building their own video platforms on top of it.

It’s not meant to replace Zoom for everyone. If you just need quick meetings, existing tools do the job.

But if you care about ownership, flexibility, or building a product around video, that’s where this came from.

Would love to hear how others here are handling video in their products.

Hey IH,

Most of us don’t think twice about where our meetings run.

We just create a link and move on.

But if you’re running a business, those meetings are actually a big part of your product and user experience.

And right now, they’re happening on someone else’s platform.

That means:

• You don’t fully control the experience

• Your branding disappears during key interactions

• Your data sits outside your system

For some use cases, that’s fine.

But for things like telemedicine, client consultations, or internal tools, it starts to matter more.

That’s why we built JupiterMeet.

A simple, private video meeting solution you can run on your own setup and integrate into your existing workflow. No redirects, no third-party dependency, just meetings under your control.

It’s less about features and more about ownership.

How much does control over your meeting experience matter in your product?