VerifyAI

Insurance against AI hallucinations.

Visit Website
September 19, 2025 The AI trust problem nobody talks about research findings :

Been researching the fact-checking market for VerifyAI. Found something interesting about how people actually use AI:

Individual users: Most people know AI hallucinates but keep using it anyway. Convenience beats accuracy. We fact-check important stuff manually (takes 15-20 mins) or just... don't.

Businesses: Different story. Legal firms got sanctioned for fake case citations. Companies pulled marketing campaigns over false AI-generated stats. One employee transferred $25M after a deepfake CEO call.

The gap is wild: consumers accept AI errors as "good enough" while enterprises face million-dollar liability when AI gets it wrong.

Two different markets:

- B2C: Education problem (people don't realize the risk)

- B2B: Risk management problem (they know but lack tools)

Building verification tools for both, but the willingness to pay is night and day. Anyone else seeing this consumer vs enterprise split in AI adoption? How do you bridge markets with such different risk tolerance?

Comment

September 18, 2025 How VerifyAI actually works under the hood

People keep asking how my AI fact-checking extension calculates those reliability scores. Here's the breakdown:

The process is pretty straightforward:

When ChatGPT says "France has 68.6 million people," my extension automatically searches Wikipedia, government databases, and Google for that exact claim.

If Wikipedia says 68.6M and INSEE (French stats office) confirms it boom, 92% reliable score. If sources contradict each other or I find nothing - low score.

The scoring:

- 3+ sources agree = 90%+ reliable

- 2 sources agree = 70-80%

- Sources disagree = 30-60%

- No sources found = under 30%

Everything's clickable so you can verify my verification. The whole point is transparency.

Where it breaks down:

Works great for basic facts, not so much for opinions or super niche topics. And yeah, it's only as good as the sources it finds.

Had someone ask if it catches deepfake transcripts - nope, that's way beyond what this does. It's just cross-referencing factual claims, not detecting AI-generated content.

Anyone building similar verification tools? Curious what approaches others are taking.

Comment

About

ChatGPT nearly embarrassed me with fake data that looked real. VerifyAI gives instant fact-checking so you don't choose between blind trust or manual verification. Built for myself - wondering if others need AI safety.