One thing that keeps getting reinforced:
Different platforms solve different problems.
On Indie Hackers, I mostly meet founders, developers, and builders.
The conversations are incredible.
People discuss validation, PMF, retention, positioning, workflows, and distribution.
You can learn more from one thoughtful comment thread than from weeks of startup content.
Today roughly 80% of my outreach effort goes into LinkedIn.
The results are interesting.
A post might reach 50 people and only 4-5 respond.
A hundred people might see it and only one or two visit the product.
At first glance those numbers don't seem impressive.
But distribution isn't just about volume.
It's about relevance.
Facebook has become a secondary channel I'm exploring more seriously.
Not because it's trendy.
Because there are still a lot of business owners spending time there.
The platform I still haven't figured out is Reddit.
My account got restricted and honestly I still don't understand how people consistently promote products there without getting buried by moderation.
The biggest lesson so far:
A thousand views from the wrong audience can be worth less than ten from the right one.
For anyone interested, I've also started documenting the journey on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Meirambek.VIDI/
What channel surprised you the most while building?
The "ten from the right audience" line is so true it hurts. On Reddit the only thing that's worked for me is basically forgetting it's a marketing channel for a while — I answer questions in my niche subs for a couple weeks with zero links, so by the time I mention what I'm building I'm not just a stranger dropping a URL. Slow, but the mods leave it alone and people actually click. The accounts that go straight to posting their launch are the ones that get nuked. Are you warming the account up first, or posting cold?
Yeah, I'm warming it up first this time.
A few of my previous accounts got nuked, so I'm trying to be more patient and actually participate before posting anything related to my product.
I’ve noticed the same thing. A post can get plenty of views but still lead to very little meaningful engagement if it reaches the wrong audience.
I’m also learning that trying to promote everywhere is less effective than understanding what each platform is actually good for.
That's fair. Although I think in the early stages it's worth testing more channels than you expect. Sometimes the platform that looks least promising ends up teaching you the most.
Great framing — the "relevance over reach" insight is huge and most founders learn it the expensive way.
On Reddit: the trick is genuinely participating in communities before you ever mention your product. I spent weeks just answering questions in coding subreddits before anyone cared about what I was building. The moment you lead with value instead of promotion, moderation stops being a problem.
The channel that surprised me most was actually replying to big accounts on X. One thoughtful reply to a viral post got more targeted traffic than a month of my own original posts. The key: add a real insight, not "great post!" — and let your profile bio do the selling.
Distribution is a long game but the compounding is real once you find the right 2-3 channels.
Thanks, appreciate it. The relevance over reach insight is really valuable - I'll keep that in mind and focus on adding value first.
Totally agree—relevance beats reach every time. 10 views from the right audience can be worth more than 1,000 from the wrong one.
Agreed. Reach gets attention. Relevance gets outcomes.
One platform I still haven't figured out is Reddit.
My account got restricted and every attempt at promotion seems to get buried by moderation.
For founders getting real users from Reddit:
What's actually working in 2026? Genuine participation, niche subreddits, ads, or something else?